NONABLATIVE TREATMENT OF MELASMA UTILIZING A Q-SWITCHED Nd:YAG LASER PEEL ASSISTED WITH A TOPICAL CARBON PHOTOENHANCER LOTION, AND ADJUNCTIVE TREATMENT WITH 633 nm RED LED LIGHT
Takahiro Fujimoto, M.D., Ph.D.
Clinic Kioizaka, Tokyo, Japan, and the Surgical Center, Research Hospital, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this clinical study was to determine the effectiveness of combination therapy with a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser with a topical carbon photoenhancer lotion and a 633 nm red light emitting diode (LED)- based system for treatment of melasma.
Materials and Methods: Thirty-four human subjects with melasma, skin types III and IV and aged in their 30ユs to their 50ユs were treated with or without (controls, medication only) the Nd:YAG laser peel and 633 nm LED therapy over 4 sessions. The Q-switched Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm, 1.8 - 2.3 J/cm2, 5 ns, beam diameter of 7 mm) was applied to skin pretreated with the topical carbon lotion, followed by 17 minutes of 633 nm LED phototherapy (107 J/cm2). All patients received oral and topical medication. Melasma was evaluated at the baseline and at 2 months with the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI).
Results: At the 8-week assessment, the MASI score had decreased by 79% in the treated group compared with 38.3% in the control group. The satisfaction indices for the treated and control groups were 14% and 0%, respectively.
Conclusions: Combination therapy with topical carbon suspension-assisted Nd:YAG laser and 633 nm LED therapy may offer a safe, non-ablative method to improve skin texture and treat melasma.
Introduction
Melasma is a common form of pigmentary disorder among Asian women and consists of an acquired hyperpigmentation involving the cheeks, forehead, nose, and upper lip. It is a common complaint in patients with darker skin tones. Although the exact pathogenesis is unknown, melasma is believed to be associated with a multifactorial etiology. Genetics, ultraviolet radiation, pregnancy, hormone therapies, stress and phototoxic drugs have been implicated in the pathogenesis of melasma [1,2]. In addition to the routine usage of broad-spectrum sunscreens, bleaching agents such as hydroquinone and tretinoin [2-4], and chemical peels [5,6], have shown satisfactory results for patients with epidermal melasma. Nevertheless, patients with dermal or mixed-type melasma are therapeutically challenging. In the past, attempts to treat melasma with lasers that targeted melanin, such as the Q-switched ruby laser and Q-switched Nd:YAG laser, yielded disappointing results [7,8].
A single treatment alone may prove to be somewhat effective but combined therapy may compound effectiveness, whereby the total efficacy of the combination therapy yields an efficacy greater than the sum of the individual components. Visible red LED therapy as a spin-off from the US NASA Space Medicine Program has been reported by Whelan and colleagues as being effective clinically [9,10]. The purpose of this clinical study was to determine the effectiveness of treatment for melasma using combination therapy with visible red (633 nm) LED therapy, Q-switched Nd: YAG laser assisted with a carbon photoenhancer lotion, together with oral and topical medication.
Subjects and Methods
34 human subjects with melasma, skin types III and IV and aged in their 30ユs to 50ユs were randomly allocated into two groups which were respectively treated with (experimental group) or without (control group) four LED and laser sessions at our clinic. Seventeen patients were treated with the carbon assisted Q-switched Nd:YAG laser (Spectra VRM, Max Engineering Limited, Seoul, Korea) and visible red (633 nm) LED therapy (Omnilux Revive, Photo Therapeutics Limited, Fazely, U.K.), during four sessions at 0, 1, 2, and 4 week intervals. Initially cosmetic skin rejuvenation was accomplished using a topically-applied lotion with carbon particles in suspension and the Nd:YAG laser at a wavelength of 1064 nm, fluence of 1.8 - 2.3 J/cm2, a pulse duration of 5 ns (Q-switched), a pulse repetition rate of 10 Hz and a fixed beam of 7 mm in diameter. Laser spots were placed with approximately 30% overlap using an identical laser technique in each patient: (1) a vertical pass; (2) a horizontal pass; and (3) a diagonal pass (beginning superiorly on the forehead and moving down to the chin). Subsequently, the patients were treated with 17 minutes of red LED therapy (approximately 107 J/cm2 per session). As the post treatment protocol, all patients were given oral medicine (250 mg of tranexamic acid and 1000 mg of ascorbic acid, three times a day) and topical medication (0.1% tretinoin and 4% hydroquinone, twice per day). The control group received only the medication regimen without laser or LED therapy.
The patients were evaluated at baseline and at 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks postoperatively. Patients were also evaluated clinically using the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) scoring system [9]. The face was divided into four areas: forehead, right malar region, left malar region, and chin, corresponding to 30%, 30%, 30%, and 10% of the total face, respectively. The severity of the melasma in each of these four regions was assessed based on three variables: percentage of the total area involved (A), darkness (D), and homogeneity (H). A numerical value was assigned for the corresponding percentage area involved: 0 = no involvement; 1 = <10% involvement; 2 = 10 29% involvement; 3 = 30 49% involvement; 4 = 50 69% involvement; 5 = 70 89% involvement; and 6 = 90 100% involvement. The darkness of the melasma (D) compared to the normal skin and the homogeneity of the hyperpigmentation (H) were rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = normal skin color without evidence of hyperpigmentation; 1 = barely visible hyperpigmentation/specks of involvement; 2 = mild hyperpigmentation/small patchy areas of involvement <1.5cm diameter; 3 = moderate hyperpigmentation/patches of involvement> 2cm diameter; 4 = severe hyperpigmentation/uniform skin involvement without any clear areas). To calculate the MASI score, the sum of the severity grade for darkness (D) and homogeneity (H) was multiplied by the numerical value of the areas (A) involved and by the percentages of the four facial areas (10 30%). These values were summated to obtain the total MASI score: Forehead 0.3 (D+H)A + Right malar 0.3 (D+H)A + Left malar 0.3 (D+H)A + Chin 0.1 (D+H)A. At the 8-week follow-up patients subjectively rated their satisfaction with the treatment on a 3-grade scale of satisfied, somewhat satisfied and dissatisfied. Those scoring ヤsatisfiedユ were expressed as a percentage to calculate the patient satisfaction index (SI).
Results
Twenty-nine patients completed the study at Week 8. Two patients in the control group dropped out at Weeks 2 and 4 because they moved away. Three patients in the carbon suspension assisted Q-switched Nd:YAG and LED group failed to complete the Week 8 follow-up because they moved away. There were no significant differences in any variables such as age, duration of melasma, skin phototypes, and baseline MASI scores between the two groups (p>0.05) (Table 1).
In the carbon suspension assisted Q-switched Nd:YAG and LED group, the mean MASI score decreased from 19.55ア3.87 at baseline to11.32ア6.40 after only one session of Q-switched Nd:YAG and LED treatment at Week 1, representing a 40.0% change in pigmentation, which is statistically significant (p<0.05). Patients had further improvement in pigmentation with subsequent treatment sessions. After four sessions of Q-switched Nd:YAG and LED treatment, the mean MASI score decreased to 4.33ア3.94 at Week 8, representing a 79.0% improvement compared to that of the baseline (p<0.005). The treatment efficacy did not correlate with any variables, such as age, duration of melasma, or skin phototypes.
In the control group, the mean MASI score decreased from 21.48ア3.31 at baseline to 13.47ア4.02 at Week 8, representing a 38.3% change in pigment intensity. The difference in improvement rate between the two groups was also found to be significant (p<0.05), with a better response in the carbon suspension assisted Q-switched Nd:YAG and LED group.
As for the patientsユ subjective SI, in the carbon assisted Q-switched Nd:YAG and LED group, 14.0% of the patients assessed their improvement as satisfied, 43.0% as slightly satisfied, and 43.0% as unsatisfied. In the control group, 53% of the patients assessed their improvement as slightly satisfied and 47% as unsatisfied. The SI for the treated and control groups were thus 14% and 0%, respectively.
The increase in the MASI scores and melanin indices coincided with the development of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation that was differentiated clinically from melasma by the involvement of additional facial areas than were observed originally. At the end of the study period, universal clinical improvement of pigmentation was observed (Figure 1). Figure 2 shows standard digital photography at baseline (A) and Week 4 (B) of a 41-year-old woman in the treatment group.
Discussion
The management of melasma is a challenge. In spite of the various topical bleaching creams available, there still remains a subset of patients unresponsive to these therapies. In this study, we demonstrated that carbon suspension assisted Q-switched Nd:YAG and LED is a safe and effective treatment for melasma in Asian subjects.
The Q-switched Nd:YAG laser has been widely used in cosmetic laser dermatology for the temporary removal of unwanted hair, tattoos, and pigmented and vascular lesions [11]. The majority of laser systems in use today employ the principle of selective thermolysis. This is the selective absorption of light of a particular wavelength by a specific substance referred to as a chromophore (photoacceptor), in this case, melanin [10]. With its ability to produce a nonspecific dermal wound through quasi-selective photothermolysis, the Q-switched Nd:YAG laser may induce new collagen formation through stimulating the wound-healing process [12.13].
Recently a variety of LED-based phototherapeutic systems have been used as alternative methods in the treatment of photodamaged skin [14]. One of the underlying mechanism for LEDs, particularly those in the red waveband such as the 633 nm LED panels used in the present study, has been determined to be stimulation of fibroblast cell organelles, in particular the mitochondria, with the proper ヤpacketsユ of photons [16] and demonstrating global improvement of the patientユs skin in facial texture, fine lines and pigmentation [17]. These techniques also all produce athermal dermal quasi-wounding without ablation, due to the photoaccelerated release of proinflammatory agents from mast cells. Combination treatments with standard photothermally-dependent non-ablative techniques such as intense pulsed light and diode lasers are being performed to determine whether LED therapy might enhance results after the deposition of photothermal damage by stimulating more collagen and producing less collagen degradation [17].
Most epidermal melasmas respond well to topical bleaching agents [2-4], a simpler and less expensive treatment. Chemical peels also show more benefits for epidermal melasma than for the mixed type [5.6]. In the present study, sun protection was advised and 4% hydroquinone cream was applied throughout the study to help prevent postinflammatory hyperpigmentation rather than treat melasma per se.
Er:YAG laser resurfacing, dermabrasion, and combined ultra-pulse CO2 laser with Q-switched alexandrite laser were also reported to show benefits for refractory melasma [9-11]. Nevertheless, these methods are more invasive and post-treatment wound care is necessary. In addition, prolonged erythema, hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation, infection, and hypertrophic scarring are potential side effects. Asian skin is prone to hyperpigmentation after even comparatively mild laser treatment [15]. The carbon suspension assisted Q-switched Nd:YAG may achieve quasi-selective photothermolysis of pigmented lesions hence the pulse duration is shorter than the thermal relaxation time of the melanosome (70-250 ns). The disappearance of the crusts led to the clinical improvement of the melasma. The pigments gradually reappeared, however, possibly because deeper pigment remained or repigmentation was induced by persistent trigger factors.
Conclusions
Combination therapy with topical carbon suspension assisted Nd:YAG laser, visible red 633 nm LED therapy and topical and oral medicine may offer a safe, non-ablative method to treat melasma.
T. Fujimoto MD PhD has indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters.
References
1: Grimes PE. Melasma: etiologic and therapeutic considerations. Arch Dermatol 1995;131: 1453-7.
2: Sanchez NP, Pathak MA, Sato S, et al. Melasma: a clinical, light microscopic, ultrastructural, and immunofluorescence study. J Am Acad Dermatol 1981;4: 698-710.
3: Pathak MA, Fitzpatrick TB, Kraus EW. Usefulness of retinoic acid in the treatment of melasma. J Am Acad Dermatol 1986;15: 894-9.
4: Griffiths CEM, Finkel LJ, Ditre CM, et al. Topical tretinoin (retinoic acid) improves melasma: a vehicle-controlled, clinical trial. Br J Dermatol 1993;129: 415-21.
5; Javaheri SM, Handa S, Kaur I, Kumar B. Safety and efficacy of glycolic acid facial peel in Indian women with melasma. Int J Dermatol 2001;40: 354-7.
6: Sarkar R, Kaur C, Bhalla M, Kanwar AJ. The combination of glycolic acid peels with a topical regimen in the treatment of melasma in dark-skinned patients: a comparative study. Dermatol Surg 2002;28: 828-32.
7: Taylor CR, Anderon RR. Ineffective treatment of refractory melasma and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation by Q-switched ruby laser. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1994;20: 592-7.
8: Tse Y, Levine VJ, Mcclain SA, Ashinoff R. The removal of cutaneous pigmented lesions with the Q-switched ruby laser and the Q-switched neodymium:yttrium- aluminum-garnet laser: a comparative study. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1994;20: 795-800.
9: Whelan HT, Houle JM, Whelan NT et al. The NASA Light-Emitting Diode Medical Program- Progress in Space Flight and Terrestrial Applications. Space Tech. & App. Intユl. Forum. 2000; 504, 37-43.
10: Whelan HT, Smits RL, Buchmann EV et al. Effect of NASA Light-Emitting Diode (LED) Irradiation on Wound Healing. Journal of Clinical Laser Medicine and Surgery 2001; 19, 305-314
11: RM & Alster T. Erbium:YAG Laser Resurfacing for Refractory Melasma. Dermatol Surg 1999;25 :121-5
12: Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science 1983;220: 524 7.
13: Goldberg DJ & Whitworth J. Laser skin resurfacing with the Q-switched Nd:YAG laser. Dermatol Surg 1997;23:903 7.
14: Goldberg DJ & Metzler C. Skin resurfacing utilizing a low-fluence Nd:YAG laser. J Cutan Laser Ther 1999;1:23 7.
15: Goldberg DJ & Metzler C. Histologic Evaluation of a Q-Switched Nd:YAG Laser in the Nonablative Treatment of Wrinkles. Dermatol Surg 2001; 27: 744-9
16: Weiss RA, McDaniel DH, Geronemus R, Weiss MA. Clinical trial of a novel non-thermal LED array for reversal of photoaging: clinical, histologic and surface profilometric results. Laser Surg. Med.2005; 36:85-91
17: Chan HH, Alam M, Kono T, Dover JS. Clinical application of lasers in Asians. Dermatol Surg 2002;28:556-63.
18: Voet D, Voet JG. Biochemistry.2nd ed. New York: John Willy &Sons, Inc.; 1995.
19: Weiss RA, Weiss MA, Geronemus RG, McDaniel DH. A novel non-thermal non-ablative full panel LED photomodulation device for reversal of photoaging: digital microscopic and clinical results in various skin types.J Drugs Dermatol. 2004;3(6):605-10.
Figure Legends
Figure 1.
Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) score for the Q-YAG& LED and control groups at different posttreatment intervals.
Figure 2.
Standard digital photography at baseline (A) and Week 4 (B) of a 41-year-old woman in the treatment group.
